Re-missioning in Pandemic Times: An Interview with Andy Lambkin 

By Cailey Morgan and Shannon Youell

Last month we introduced Andy Lambkin and simplechurches. Today, we have the honor of sharing an interview with some of Andy’s thoughts around the challenges and opportunities COVID-19 affords us. 

CBWC: What questions should pastors be asking themselves in this season 

Andy Lambkin: What buttons are being pushed in you personally? When you find yourself filled with fear, what is it that is driving that fear? When you find yourself “scrambling” as you think and plan into the future, what motivates the thinking and planning? What does this reveal? What is the Holy Spirit telling you about yourself, your ministry, and the things he may want to strip away? 

What are the “shadow values” that drive your pastoral ministry? In my life, I find three: Ego—my insecure heart that desires recognition and affirmation from those I lead; Technique—a desire to look toward ministry techniques to grow my ministry to feed my ego; Control—an impulse to control people which I assume is for their good but is often for my protection.  

CBWC: Wow—important self-reflections! On a corporate or community level, what should churches be asking themselves?  

How can we align our structures with the things that God values? To put that another way, do our structures prohibit us from living out God’s values? Are we spending our time trying to fight for our structures when God might be opening us to another way of serving and being? 

Here’s a video from Andy on this topic of values and structures: 


CBWC: What one change would see as a significant first step towards changing how we view the gathered community? 

Andy:  I think the local church needs to look critically at how it uses money. In most cases, a simple and honest audit quickly reveals that the vast majority of our money is used toward staffing and internal programming. These funds enable us to continue to support and even entrench ourselves in a particular approach to the gathered community.  

In Matthew 6, Jesus said, “For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.” This tells me two things:  

  1. If we look at our money, we will see what it is we truly treasure.
  2. If we discover that what we treasure is not good or pleasing or helpful, we need to reassign our money toward the things God wants us to treasure. Doing this will force the necessary changes to our hearts. 

Follow the money. It’s the canary in the coal mine and often the only way we force change upon ourselves.  

CBWC: Have you found patterns of things that people are afraid of as they approach change that they really shouldn’t worry about? Why not?  

Andy: I’ve never thought about this question before! I think the dominant fear is a fear of failure and all the things that come with this: embarrassment, shame, hurt, financial decline, pain. And the truth is, all of these might be part of our experience. We can’t protect ourselves from these things if we are going to venture into change.  

As I write these words, the Bruce Cockburn song, “Lovers in a Dangerous Time” plays through my mind: “nothing worth having comes without some kind of fight.” Perhaps we might alter this somewhat, “nothing worth having comes without some kind of pain.”   

CBWC: Along those lines, what would you say to an existing congregation who is considering changing decades-engrained rhythms of gathering?  

Andy: Funny enough, in most cases, I advise against rapid wholesale change unless there is an overwhelming consensus toward the change. Or unless there is little chance of anything surviving without a change. In my observation, the church (especially older churches) tend to be made up primarily of people who are change-resistant. The reason why the church remains the same over many years (and I’m not talking about those fundamental building blocks which shouldn’t change, I’m talking about the programs and the bulletins and the annual calendar of events etc.) is that the people who make up the majority (including most pastors) prefer the consistent, predictable patterns. They tend to be the late adopters as the early adopters often get frustrated and move on or join a church plant. Making abrupt changes with this group of people can create more pain and trouble than what is helpful. 

When we started our churches, the people that came with us all volunteered for the work. They were, by nature, people that sat on the front-side of that change continuum. They were the early adopters. And yet, even with this group, the biggest hurdle we faced in our first years was those deeply ingrained rhythms and the desire for people to return to those cherished and familiar traditions.  

Instead of making a wide-sweeping change to an entire community, I would suggest sending the willing out as an experimental project. Many significant organizations have branches which are known as “skunkworks.” Skunkworks are parts of a corporation that are set up as distinct from the main corporation and are provided resources (with few strings) to experiment and try new things.  

This seems an interesting approach to the church, where we release the willing and eager to step out into new environments and try to create new rhythms. 

For more on how simplechurches structure themselves and their rhythms, check out this video:  

 

What further questions do Andy’s thoughtful responses elicit for you? How have you been helped by his comments? Let us know! 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s